Interactive concept · Fictional data · Simulated agents
Compare costs and delivery dates, resolve missing information, and prepare a report with its sources attached. Follow an operations manager choosing a supplier for 2,000 printed mailer boxes.
Three fictional supplier quotes become a sourced recommendation. Review an unsupported claim, add a simulated supplier reply and compare the updated report before human review.
Open the workspace and work through the example at your own pace.
The example, step by step
The job is to buy 2,000 printed mailer boxes that arrive by 30 November. The report brings the prices, delivery commitments and supporting passages together for purchasing review.
Alder quotes $4,000 delivered. Cobalt quotes $4,140. Birch lists $3,600 in goods and setup, but has not confirmed freight or arrival. The missing fields stay visible, so an incomplete quote is not treated as the cheapest complete offer.
The initial draft says Birch cannot meet the deadline. The reviewer flags that sentence and opens the quote beside it: the source only confirms dispatch. Compare the proposed correction and accept wording that accurately describes the missing information.
Load the simulated supplier reply: Birch confirms $220 freight and arrival on 27 November. Its delivered total becomes $3,820, which is $180 less than Alder. The comparison updates, and the existing report is marked as needing revision.
Review the current recommendation, cost calculation, delivery condition and source references. A person acknowledges the current version before downloading the text report. The report recommends a supplier; it does not place an order.
How the work is coordinated
In the underlying implementation, a coordinator passes the working context to a writing specialist, then sends the draft and original evidence to a separate reviewer.
Collects usable source excerpts, facts and open questions into a bounded working context.
Prepares a candidate draft with references to the evidence it uses.
Receives the candidate and original evidence, then returns findings for review.
Rule-based checks validate references and input consistency around the model calls. Changed source material can invalidate an earlier review.
These are separate workflows in the underlying system. This demonstration uses supplied sources and simulated responses.
Explore the workspace
A useful place to start
Tell us how work moves through your business. We can shape a system around the people, decisions and handoffs involved.
